Mouse Study Reveals New Clues about Virulence
of 1918 Influenza Virus
Overactive Immune Response Key Contributor to Lethality
The first comprehensive analysis of an animal’s immune response
to the 1918 influenza virus provides new insights into the killer
flu, report federally supported scientists in an article appearing
online today in the journal Nature. Key among these insights,
they found that the 1918 virus triggers a hyperactive immune response
that may contribute to the lethality of the virus. Furthermore,
their results suggest that it is the combination of all eight of
the 1918 flu virus genes interacting synergistically that accounts
for the exceptional virulence of this virus.
Michael G. Katze, Ph.D., of the University of Washington School
of Medicine, Seattle, a grantee of the National Institute of Allergy
and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), one of the National Institutes
of Health (NIH), led the research team with University of Washington’s
John Kash, Ph.D. The work with the fully reconstructed 1918 virus
was conducted by coauthor Terrence Tumpey, Ph.D., in a biosafety
level 3-enhanced laboratory at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC) in Atlanta.
“Understanding as much as possible about the virus that caused
the devastating 1918-1919 influenza pandemic is an urgent imperative
as we pursue efforts to prepare for — and possibly thwart — the
next flu pandemic,” says NIH Director Elias A. Zerhouni, M.D.
“This elegant research gives a detailed picture of the overzealous
host reaction to infection by a fully reconstructed 1918 influenza
virus,” says NIAID Director Anthony S. Fauci, M.D. “The research
provides clues as to why the flu of 1918 was so deadly, and may
also help us better understand the disease process that occurs
when people are infected by emerging avian influenza viruses, such
as the H5N1 strain.”
Unlike typical seasonal flu, which strikes hardest at the very
young, the elderly and those with compromised immune function,
the 1918 flu disproportionately killed young people in the prime
of life. Modern analyses of 1918 flu victim autopsy samples show
extreme and extensive damage to lung tissues. This observation
gave rise to the hypothesis that the 1918 flu virus infection provoked
an uncontrolled inflammatory response leading to rapid lung failure
and death.
To test this idea, Dr. Tumpey infected mice intranasally with
one of four types of flu virus: human seasonal flu virus from a
strain that circulated in Texas in 1991; lab-made viruses containing
either two or five of eight viral genes from the 1918 virus; or
a reconstructed virus containing all eight 1918 flu virus genes.
Lung tissue from three infected mice in each group was removed
on days 1, 3 and 5 post-infection and processed to destroy any
virus. The mouse genetic material (RNA) was then extracted from
these lung samples and sent to the University of Washington team
for analysis.
Drs. Katze and Kash and colleagues examined the mouse RNA using
microarrays to determine which genes were activated when exposed
to each of the four viruses. This analysis showed that the immune
response to the reconstructed 1918 virus containing all eight flu
genes was much greater than to any of the other viruses with all
eight genes, says Dr. Katze. In particular, genes involved in promoting
inflammation were strongly and immediately activated following
infection by the reconstructed 1918 virus. “We clearly see a dramatic
and uncontrolled immune response in the mouse lungs as early as
one day following infection with the reconstructed 1918 virus,” he
says. A complete understanding of the host’s response to the 1918
flu virus, adds Dr. Katze, requires use of a fully reconstructed
virus.
A fuller picture of the host immune response to the 1918 flu virus
could also be valuable to scientists working to develop therapies
against such viruses as the H5N1 avian influenza, the researchers
note. Besides targeting the flu virus itself, Dr. Katze explains,
researchers might develop new or improved agents aimed at moderating
or halting the human immune system’s overactive response to these
viruses.
In addition to Dr. Katze, other NIAID grantees contributing to
this research included Christopher F. Basler, Ph.D., Peter Palese,
Ph.D., and Adolfo García-Sastre, Ph.D., all of Mount Sinai School
of Medicine, New York. Jeffery K. Taubenberger, M.D., Ph.D., formerly
of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Rockville, MD, and
now of NIAID, is also a coauthor.
Besides support from NIAID, Dr. Katze, who is professor of microbiology
at the University of Washington and Associate Director of Washington
National Primate Center, also received grants from the National
Center for Research Resources and from the National Institute on
Drug Abuse, both components of NIH, for his research.
For more information on influenza see http://www3.niaid.nih.gov/news/focuson/flu. Also
visit http://www.PandemicFlu.gov for
one-stop access to U.S. government information on avian and pandemic
flu.
News releases, fact sheets and other NIAID-related materials are
available on the NIAID Web site at http://www.niaid.nih.gov.
NIAID is a component of the National Institutes of Health.
NIAID supports basic and applied research to prevent, diagnose
and treat infectious diseases such as HIV/AIDS and other sexually
transmitted infections, influenza, tuberculosis, malaria and
illness from potential agents of bioterrorism. NIAID also supports
research on basic immunology, transplantation and immune-related
disorders, including autoimmune diseases, asthma and allergies.
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) — The Nation's
Medical Research Agency — includes 27 Institutes and
Centers and is a component of the U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services. It is the primary federal agency for conducting
and supporting basic, clinical and translational medical research,
and it investigates the causes, treatments, and cures for both
common and rare diseases. For more information about NIH and
its programs, visit www.nih.gov. |