Skip Over Navigation Links
NIH National Institutes of Health, DHHS
NIH Home PageHealth InformationGrants & Funding OpportunitiesNewsResearch Training & Scientific Resources at NIHInstitutes, Centers & OfficesAbout NIH
Building 1
Advanced Search Page

Home > News & Events > NIH Radio > March 2006 Audio Reports

NIH Radio

Quick Links

About NIH Radio

Archived Audio Reports

NIH Podcast

 

Panel Finds Insufficient Evidence to Recommend For or Against Maternal-Request Caesarean Delivery

Right Click to Download MP3 File

Brief Description:
An independent panel convened by the National Institutes of Health announced that the available information comparing the risks and benefits of caesarean delivery on maternal request — otherwise known as CDMR — versus planned vaginal birth do not provide the basis for a recommendation in either direction.

Transcript:
Schmalfeldt: An independent panel convened by the National Institutes of Health announced that the available information comparing the risks and benefits of caesarean delivery on maternal request — otherwise known as CDMR — versus planned vaginal birth do not provide the basis for a recommendation in either direction. The Panel, convened by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the Office of Medical Applications of Research, defined CDMR as a caesarean delivery for a singleton pregnancy at the mother's request when she has no established medical indication for the procedure. Doctor Mary E. D'Alton of Columbia University was the panel chair. She outlined the findings of the conference at an NIH press conference.

D'Alton: We found that the incidence of caesarean delivery without medical and obstetrical indication is rising in the United States, and a component of this is due to caesarean delivery by maternal request. Given the current tools that are available, the magnitude of caesarean delivery by maternal request is difficult to quantify. There is insufficient evidence at this time to fully evaluate the benefits and risks of caesarean delivery by maternal request as compared to planned vaginal delivery, and more research is needed. Until quality evidence becomes available, any decision to perform a caesarean delivery on maternal request should be carefully individualized and consistant with ethical principles. Given the risks that placentia previa and accrete rise with each caesarean delivery, caesarean delivery on maternal request is not recommended for women desiring several children. Caesarean delivery on maternal request should not be performed prior to thirty-nine weeks or without verification of lung maturity, because of the significant danger of neonatal respiratory complications. Request for caesarean delivery on maternal request should not be motivated by unavailability of effective pain management. Efforts must be made to assure availability of pain management services for all women in this country. And NIH or other federal agency, we believe, should establish and maintain a web site to provide up-to-date information on the benefits and risks of all modes of delivery.

Schmalfeldt: According to the draft statement issued by the panel, potential benefits of CDMR include a decreased risk of hemorrhaging for the mother, and a reduced risk of certain birth injuries for the baby. Potential risks of CDMR include a longer hospital stay and increased risk of respiratory problems for the baby. To address the weaknesses they identified in the available scientific literature, the Panel made a variety of recommendations for future research, including: Surveys of women (before and after birth), providers, insurers, and health care facilities regarding CDMR, A thorough assessment of the costs of CDMR, Establishment of uniform documentation of CDMR, to accurately reflect prevalence of the procedure, Examination of existing large databases to assess incidence of various complications, including rare but critical outcomes, and Development of strategies to predict and influence the likelihood of successful vaginal birth. The Panel released its findings on March 29, following two days of expert presentations and panel deliberations. Full text of the Panel's draft state-of-the-science statement is available at http://consensus.nih.gov. The final version will be available at the same Web address in three to four weeks. From the National Institutes of Health, I'm Bill Schmalfeldt in Bethesda, Maryland.

Date: 03/29/2006
Reporter:
Bill Schmalfeldt
Sound Bite:
Dr. Mary E. D'Alton
Topic:
Caesarean Delivery
Institute(s): NICHD; OMAR
 

This page was last reviewed on March 30, 2006 .

[ Q&A About NIH | Jobs at NIH | Visitor Information | FOIA ]
[ Telephone & Service Directory | Employee Information | Información en español ]

[ Contact Us | Privacy Notice | Disclaimers | Accessibility | Site Map | Search ]

N I H logo - link to the National Institutes of Health

National Institutes of Health (NIH)
9000 Rockville Pike
Bethesda, Maryland 20892

    H H S logo - link to U. S. Department of Health and Human Services

Department of Health
and Human Services

 

  Link to USA Gov Web Site - The U.S. government's official web portal